Gartner prides itself on its reputation for independence and objectivity. Your access and use of this publication are governed by Gartner’s Usage Policy. Although Gartner research may address legal and financial issues, Gartner does not provide legal or investment advice and its research should not be construed or used as such. While the information contained in this publication has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, Gartner disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of such information. It consists of the opinions of Gartner’s research organization, which should not be construed as statements of fact. This publication may not be reproduced or distributed in any form without Gartner’s prior written permission. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. With a wide range of clients to fit every virtual desktop solution, what sets us apart from the rest is our unsurpassed level of available and reliable customer service, our no-charge 10ZiG Manager Software, our no-registration, instant 3-Year Warranty with Advance Replacement program, and our hassle-free, 30-day Complimentary Demos. We live and breathe Thin and Zero technology, as it is our sole focus. And, whether your deployment is better aligned for Blast Extreme or PCoIP, the good news is that there is a protocol and client that matches your VDI scenario.ġ0ZiG Technology is a market leader in cutting-edge Thin Client and Zero Client devices.

Let’s be clear: where both protocols are suited for any one deployment, VMware Horizon 7 supports both, simultaneously. Scenario: PCoIP may be a good consideration for Healthcare, Financial, CAD, and Media sectors, and/or if you require multi-monitor lossless support with configurable bandwidth and tuning options. A Teradici zero client is required, or if using general purpose hardware (x86 architecture), a mid-to-high end CPU is recommended, for decoding PCoIP. The card is a cost-saving value when compared to Blast Extreme functionality, which requires server-side GPUs to support graphics rendering H.264 encode. To allow for increased server scalability, encoding is optionally offloaded onto APEX 2800 LP hardware, a dedicated and separate interface card. Unlike Blast Extreme, it allows for the compression and decompression of images, i.e. It also supports configurable server/client CPU and bandwidth use. Scenario: Blast Extreme may be a good option if you have invested in a NVIDIA GRID (Telsa M cards) and have many mobile users, affording longer battery lives and better performance.īest for multi-monitor set ups, PCoIP supports multiple codecs for different displays like text, image, and video. Such cards are able to offload H.264 encoding tasks from server CPU resulting in increased server scalability. Additionally, Blast Extreme works well for new deployments where servers are equipped with server-based GPUs that support H.264 encode capability. It requires less bandwidth than PCoIP and supports TCP and UDP, so it is more suitable for mobile and lossy networks. It can be used on general purpose hardware, resulting in acceleration of operation where H.264 hardware decoding is supported. Nearly any type of device can decode this protocol. While there is no “one-fits-all” scenario, this will shed some light on their individual capabilities.īlast Extreme was designed with mobile networks and devices in mind, being based upon H.264 video format coding. With the release of VMware Horizon 7 featuring Blast Extreme, there is good reason to be questioning and researching the difference between it and PCoIP.

Teradici pcoip with vmware